Crain's Business
It is said that flattery will get you a long way. Imitation is supposedly the greatest form of flattery, but on reading this article today, I’m not so sure. Follow that link and you will discover two things – firstly, that it takes you to Crain’s Manchester Business, a respected local business news portal, and, secondly, that you have to pay to read content on there. For the purposes of this blog, you are going to have to take my word that the article in question relates to the ongoing saga of Stadium Point, the big music venue I talked about on here the other week and also – importantly for the point I am about to make – in this article on our main site.
I’m going to cut to the proverbial chase – there are certain elements in the Crain’s article that have been taken directly from my own carefully crafted news piece. My words, over which I laboured for many minutes and connected with great thought and care into sentences and even paragraphs, have been copied. Let’s take a look; this is the opening paragraph from my original article, published on 12 January 2010:
“An application has been submitted by the owners of Sankeys to transform an empty warehouse in Trafford Park into a huge club and live music venue. The site, which sits around three miles from the centre of Manchester, is in an industrial area surrounded by offices and with the Imperial War Museum across the road, just across the water from Salford Quays, The Lowry Centre and the new Media City.”
Crain’s article, published on 25 January 2010, starts thus:
“As you are aware an application has been submitted by the owners of Sankeys to transform an empty warehouse in Trafford Park into a huge club and live music venue. The site sits around three miles from the centre of Manchester, the area surrounded by offices, the Imperial War Museum and just across the water from Salford Quays, The Lowry Centre and the new Media City.”
Note to Crain’s – sticking ‘As you are aware’ at the beginning doesn’t make it any less obvious. Let’s move on. My article continues:
“The new venue, provisionally called ‘Stadium Point’, is being designed to rival the likes of the MEN Arena and The Apollo, focussing on the ‘stand up and dance’ crowd, rather than the ‘sit down and tap feet’ crowd.”
I was quite pleased with that – the ‘stand up and dance crowd’ phrase was in the Stadium Point brochure but I coined the ‘sit down and tap feet crowd’ counter – clever, aren’t I? Crain’s obviously think so – their article continued:
“The venue, Stadium Point, is being designed to rival the likes of the MEN Arena and The Apollo, focussing on the “stand up and dance” crowd, rather than the “sit down and tap feet” crowd.”
Hmm...I’m not feeling this now, Crain’s. I mean, you can have the dreary ‘this is what it is and where it is’ sentences, they’re easy (although why you need to nick them I’m not sure) but stealing the good stuff, that’s just not on. Here’s me again:
“In a proposal document released by the developers for a meeting with local residents, the team behind the project, headed by Dave Vincent, owner of Sankeys, state that, “Our market is not old bands like Elton John, Paul McCartney etc. It is more Elbow, Madonna, Eminem, Ian Brown, Dizzy Rascal, Calvin Harris, Moby, Basement Jaxx etc.” They claim that their capacity to be flexible with their floor plan, able to accommodate shows for between 3,500 to 16,000 punters, will set them apart from the competition. Their shows will attract a public who “want to dance (a [sic] indoor festival vibe), instead of being seated, and artistes want to perform in a more edgy venue.”
And Crain’s:
"In a proposal document the team behind the project, headed by Dave Vincent, owner of Sankeys, state that: “Our market is not old bands like Elton John, Paul McCartney etc. It is more Elbow, Madonna, Eminem, Ian Brown, Dizzy Rascal, Calvin Harris, Moby, Basement Jaxx etc.” They claim that their capacity to be flexible with their floor plan, able to accommodate shows for between 3,500 to 16,000 punters, will set them apart from the competition. Their shows will attract a public who want to dance, instead of being seated, and artistes want to perform in a more edgy venue.”
Do we all get the point now? Good. Let’s just recap: Crain’s are charging people to read words that I have written. Conclusion: Crain’s think I am a better writer and journalist than the people they pay to write and do journalist stuff.
If you want me to write for you, Crain’s, all you have to do is ask, and I will politely decline. Otherwise, stop nicking our articles. Thank you.





